Both articles, Visual Communication & Other Misunderstandings and Design Justice Network Principles, present overlapping themes. One point they make clear. We must rethink design processes. Throughout both texts, it is implied that designers are not at the centre of the problems we try to solve. We are dependent from the people we are trying to solve problems. People come to us through their problems. As designers, “we appreciate the process where we can discuss, shape and communicate these matters with them.”
At the basis of it all lies empathy. It plays a huge role in the design decisions whether it be in culture, community, economy, markets or politics. Its about connecting with those who need our help and truly listening to their stories and struggles. Its about finding ways to have them reconnect with what is already theirs for the taking. We cant simply do the work blinded from their needs. We must work collectively, side by side with each other. By pure empathetic questioning and dialogue, we can begin to find what works within these communities and where the true struggles lie for “those who are directly impacted.” Design and empathy work hand in hand to “sustain, heal, and empower our communities.” What is the point of design if not to solve complex problems in creative ways that work toward the betterment of society.
As much as I agree that with certain ideas brought up within the texts, I don't think it is highly realistic to have such a narrow view of what design should be. I definitely agree that when a design problem involves a greater community or social issue, we should involve those involved and worry more about the final usage of the design. However, design is sometimes also about the “aesthetic wrap” and about selling. Its unrealistic to think its not.
Comments